Capability architecture
Questions that keep their lineage.
An investigation is opened from the intelligence that prompted it, answered by an analyst from the preserved evidence, and kept with the decision your team made.
01Why it matters
- Intelligence raises questions — is this our contractor, is this access still live, what should we tell the board — and the answers need to be traceable later.
- When an alert or perspective is revised, a question asked against the old revision must not silently change meaning.
- Decision records are what auditors, insurers and incident reviews ask for.
02ThreatCanary approach
- Investigations are raised from a specific alert or perspective and bind to that exact revision.
- Analysts respond from the preserved evidence, within the same review rules that govern alerts.
- The question, the response and the decision are kept together as a tamper-evident history.
03What you see
- Open and closed investigations, each linked to the intelligence that prompted it.
- The analyst response, the evidence it cites and the decision recorded.
- A history that survives revisions to the underlying alert or perspective.
04Evidence produced
- Attributable question-and-response records bound to a revision.
- Decision history for reporting and review.
- Audit events for every change.