Requirement-led analysis

Investigations

Turn delivered intelligence into a traceable question, response and decision history — every request bound to the exact alert or perspective revision it came from.

Evidence-backedAnalyst-reviewedNo actor engagement

The screen

What your team sees.

Built on the same preserved evidence as every alert and perspective. Open the live demo

Alert detail · what an investigation is raised againstExample tenant
Screenshot: a published alert explained — what happened, why it matters, credibility, confidence, what remains uncertain and the recommended defensive response.
Capability architecture

Questions that keep their lineage.

An investigation is opened from the intelligence that prompted it, answered by an analyst from the preserved evidence, and kept with the decision your team made.

01

Why it matters

  • Intelligence raises questions — is this our contractor, is this access still live, what should we tell the board — and the answers need to be traceable later.
  • When an alert or perspective is revised, a question asked against the old revision must not silently change meaning.
  • Decision records are what auditors, insurers and incident reviews ask for.
02

ThreatCanary approach

  • Investigations are raised from a specific alert or perspective and bind to that exact revision.
  • Analysts respond from the preserved evidence, within the same review rules that govern alerts.
  • The question, the response and the decision are kept together as a tamper-evident history.
03

What you see

  • Open and closed investigations, each linked to the intelligence that prompted it.
  • The analyst response, the evidence it cites and the decision recorded.
  • A history that survives revisions to the underlying alert or perspective.
04

Evidence produced

  • Attributable question-and-response records bound to a revision.
  • Decision history for reporting and review.
  • Audit events for every change.
Common questions

Questions teams ask before they commit.

Direct answers on scope, evidence, safety controls and how ThreatCanary differs from tools you already run.

01

Who answers an investigation?

A ThreatCanary analyst, from the preserved evidence in your tenant and under the same evidence and review rules that apply to alerts. The response cites what it rests on and records what remains uncertain.

02

What happens if the alert is revised after I asked?

Nothing changes in your investigation. It stays bound to the revision you asked about, so the question, the response and the decision keep their original meaning. The current revision is available alongside it.

Evaluate the capability

See this capability work against your attack surface.

Book a product walkthrough