Validate how exposed assets, APIs, identities and trust relationships can be chained into realistic compromise paths.
An attack-path graph is a hypothesis until each required relationship survives controlled validation.
Direct answers on scope, evidence, safety controls and how ThreatCanary differs from tools you already run.
Attack-path validation is the practice of proving that a sequence of individually minor weaknesses can be combined by an attacker to reach something that matters. Rather than scoring findings in isolation, it tests whether exposed assets, APIs, identities and trust relationships can be chained into a realistic compromise path, and produces evidence for the ones that can.
A vulnerability is a single weakness in one component. An attack path is the route an adversary takes across several of them — an exposed service leading to an API, an API leaking an identity, an identity granting access to sensitive data. Individually each step may be rated low; the path is what makes them serious, and it only becomes visible when relationships are modelled.
ThreatCanary validation is evidence-backed, distinguishing theoretical exposure from exploitability that can be reproduced, reviewed and acted upon. Validated paths remain connected to the affected assets, APIs, identity context, data sensitivity, ownership and remediation workflow, so the finding can be verified independently rather than taken on trust.
