Use Case

Use Cases

Explore how ThreatCanary applies continuous attack-path validation to common security problems.

What this covers

Start with the security question your current tools cannot answer.

Choose the outcome you need to prove, then follow the discovery, context and controlled validation required to reach a defensible verdict.

01

Prove real exposure

  • Determine whether a weakness is reachable and exploitable in the target environment.
  • Validate the required hops from an external foothold to data, identity or operational impact.
  • Work backwards from a crown jewel to the smallest control change that breaks the path.
02

Find what changed or escaped governance

  • Discover unknown internet-facing systems with reviewable attribution evidence.
  • Reconcile observed APIs with specifications, gateways, repositories and ownership records.
  • Detect routes, services and controls that drifted, survived retirement or were never documented.
03

Test target-specific abuse

  • Model identity, objects, state and sequence to test application business logic.
  • Turn emerging global research into explicit, governed vulnerability hypotheses.
  • Adapt the next test to observed behaviour instead of stopping at a static plugin result.
04

Act on the verdict

  • Prioritise remediation by demonstrated path and business consequence.
  • Give engineers reproducible proof and a deterministic retest.
  • Give leaders a concise exposure narrative that remains linked to the technical evidence.
Use-case directory

Start with the security question you need answered.

Validate real exposure

Prove whether weaknesses are reachable, exploitable and connected to meaningful impact.

Discover change and hidden surface

Continuously identify the assets, APIs and behavioural drift that static inventories miss.

Operate and prioritise

Turn validated evidence into research, remediation and reporting decisions.

See the operating model

Move from exposed assets to evidence-backed action.

Book a platform walkthrough