EASMExposure Intelligence
ThreatCanary discovers what attackers can see externally, then connects that exposure to APIs, identities, sensitive data and validation workflows.
Evidence traceApproved scopeTarget-aware testing
Exposure workflowInventory is the start—not the outcome.
External observations become useful when ownership, change, technology and reachable attack paths remain connected.
Open the sample evidence pack → - 01
DiscoverDomains, services and unknown assets
- 02
AttributeOwnership, technology and confidence
- 03
Track changeNew exposure and material drift
- 04
ConnectReachability, APIs and trust
- 05
PrioritiseEvidence-backed paths to action
Representative product workflow. This diagram explains the evidence model; it is not presented as a customer result or live product capture.
Capability architecture
External discovery becomes useful when ownership and attacker value are known.
ThreatCanary connects observable infrastructure with change, ownership, APIs and validation so teams can act on meaningful exposure.
01Why it matters
- Modern environments expose domains, subdomains, cloud edges, development services, certificates, API documentation and forgotten infrastructure.
- Inventory alone does not tell teams whether an exposed service can become a path to compromise.
- Exposure must be correlated with API behaviour, trust relationships, ownership, vulnerability intelligence and sensitive data.
02ThreatCanary approach
- Continuously discovers external assets, ports, services, web applications, technologies, certificates, cloud exposure and APIs.
- Builds relationships between exposed systems, APIs, identities, data sensitivity and findings inside the graph.
- Prioritises exposure based on exploitability, chainability and relevance to critical systems.
03Core capabilities
- External asset discovery, subdomain enumeration and DNS intelligence.
- Cloud exposure identification, service fingerprinting and certificate trust analysis.
- Shadow asset detection, exposure drift monitoring and scope-aware scanning orchestration.
- Exposure validation that feeds attack-path reasoning and offensive testing.
04Evidence produced
- Attributed asset inventory with evidence provenance.
- First-seen and change history for exposed services.
- Reachability and validation context for prioritisation.
Common questions
Questions teams ask before they commit.
Direct answers on scope, evidence, safety controls and how ThreatCanary differs from tools you already run.
01What is external attack surface management (EASM)?
External attack surface management is the continuous discovery and monitoring of everything an organisation exposes to the internet — domains, subdomains, hosts, services, APIs, certificates and cloud edges — including assets outside official inventories. It exists because most organisations expose more than they can enumerate manually, and that exposure changes constantly as teams deploy.
02How does ThreatCanary EASM differ from a standard EASM tool?
A standard EASM tool produces an inventory of exposed assets. ThreatCanary treats that inventory as the starting point: discovered exposure is linked to APIs, identities, ownership and trust relationships in a graph, then validated to confirm what is genuinely reachable and meaningful. The distinction is between knowing an asset is exposed and knowing that exposure can actually be used.
03Can ThreatCanary find assets we do not know about?
Yes — shadow asset detection specifically targets exposed assets sitting outside approved inventories, ownership models and expected deployment paths. Discovery draws on external asset enumeration, certificate and TLS trust analysis, technology fingerprinting and cloud exposure discovery, and ReconDelta tracks how the surface changes over time so newly exposed services are surfaced as they appear.
04How is scope controlled during discovery?
Scope management defines exactly what ThreatCanary is authorised to discover, test and validate, with explicit boundaries. Scanning orchestration then controls intensity, scheduling and safety limits for how those workflows run. Discovery and validation stay inside the authorised boundary you define.