Why it matters
- Annual pentests cannot keep pace with continuous change.
- Autonomous execution without context produces noise.
- Continuous operations need governance, evidence and prioritisation.
Autonomous Offensive Operations
Run continuous offensive workflows that reassess exposure, generate hypotheses and validate realistic paths as environments change.
Evidence traceApproved scopeTarget-aware testing
Capability architecture
Autonomous operations need transparent control, not blind execution.
ThreatCanary runs scoped reconnaissance, hypothesis and validation workflows while preserving operator authority and a reviewable record.
ThreatCanary approach
- Operate over current graph context and approved scope.
- Trigger workflows from new exposure, API changes, vulnerability intelligence or analyst input.
- Record methodology, tests, decisions, evidence and outcomes for review.
What it validates or reveals
- Continuous validation coverage.
- Emerging attack paths.
- Findings that evolve as the environment changes.
Evidence produced
- Run log with scope, approvals and actions.
- Hypothesis outcomes including failed validation.
- Escalations that explain what requires human judgement.
Evaluate the capability
Book a product walkthrough