Operating picture

Intelligence command centre

A current view of the evidence, exposures and assessed intelligence that shape how adversaries see this organisation — on one screen.

Evidence-backedAnalyst-reviewedNo actor engagement

The screen

What your team sees.

Built on the same preserved evidence as every alert and perspective. Open the live demo

Intelligence command centreExample tenant
Screenshot: the Intelligence command centre with posture, recommended next move, seven-day signal and exposure layers.
Capability architecture

Posture, next move and what changed — in one place.

The command centre is built from the same preserved evidence as every alert and perspective, so the headline numbers always open to their source.

01

Why it matters

  • Teams need to answer two questions quickly — how exposed are we right now, and what should we do first.
  • Posture that cannot be traced to evidence is a guess; a dashboard of counts without a recommended move is a to-do list.
  • What changed this week matters more than a static score.
02

ThreatCanary approach

  • Current posture is assessed from reviewed alerts, the adversary perspective and identity exposure, and stated with its rationale.
  • The recommended next move is the single defensive action with the strongest evidence behind it.
  • Exposure layers — access, identities, leaks, malware — and the seven-day signal show where the picture moved.
03

What you see

  • Posture and the recommended next move, with the alert or perspective that justifies them.
  • Seven-day adversary signal and the exposure layers behind it.
  • The priority intelligence that changed for you, ordered by relevance and urgency.
04

Evidence produced

  • A defensible statement of current posture with its supporting alerts.
  • Headline counts that open to the underlying records.
  • A record of what changed and when, for the team and for reporting.
Common questions

Questions teams ask before they commit.

Direct answers on scope, evidence, safety controls and how ThreatCanary differs from tools you already run.

01

How is posture decided?

From the reviewed intelligence in your tenant — published alerts, the current adversary perspective and identity exposure — and it is stated with its rationale. It is an analyst-reviewed assessment, not a score computed from indicator counts.

02

Can the command centre be delivered outside the workspace?

The intelligence behind it is also delivered through email alerts and digests, webhooks and a tenant-scoped API, so the same assessed changes can reach your ticketing, SIEM or reporting tools.

Evaluate the capability

See this capability work against your attack surface.

Book a product walkthrough