Integrations
Integration Hub

Integrations

Bring ownership and environment context into ThreatCanary, then move validated evidence into the systems where teams investigate and remediate.

Book a demo Explore the platform
What this covers

Context comes in. Evidence and action go back out.

Each integration should have an explicit purpose, bounded permissions and a documented data flow. ThreatCanary uses integrations to improve context before validation and preserve evidence after it.

01

Enrich the graph

  • Import relevant asset, API, service, repository, ownership, gateway and telemetry context.
  • Correlate external observations with the teams, environments and workflows responsible for them.
  • Improve API discovery, drift analysis, sensitive-data classification and attack-path reasoning.
02

Deliver validated evidence

  • Send findings with affected entities, validation evidence, impact rationale and remediation context attached.
  • Update downstream workflows when exposure changes, remediation is verified or a path is no longer reproducible.
  • Link analysts and engineers back to the complete evidence chain in ThreatCanary.
03

Fit existing operations

  • Connect cloud, gateway and repository systems that supply context before testing.
  • Route work through Jira, Slack, SIEM platforms and webhooks after validation.
  • Keep investigation, engineering and reporting teams aligned on the same finding state.
04

Govern every connection

  • Use least-privilege credentials and approved scopes for integration access.
  • Document what data enters ThreatCanary, what leaves it and which workflow initiates the transfer.
  • Review credential use, configuration changes and exports according to customer requirements.
Common questions

Questions teams ask before they commit.

Direct answers on scope, evidence, safety controls and how ThreatCanary differs from tools you already run.

01

What does ThreatCanary integrate with?

ThreatCanary provides integration pages for cloud platforms, API gateways, source control, CI, ticketing, chat, SIEM and webhooks. Availability and deployment requirements should be confirmed during technical scoping.

02

Why connect repositories and ticketing systems?

Repository context helps map affected APIs and services to owners, while ticketing integrations carry validated evidence and retest state into the workflow used to remediate the issue.

03

Can ThreatCanary send data into internal systems?

Webhook and security-operations integrations are designed to move validated events and evidence into approved downstream workflows. Exact payloads and permissions are defined during integration setup.

Related capabilities

Continue exploring ThreatCanary

Follow the evidence from the current problem into the product capabilities and validation workflows that address it.

01

Workflow Automation

See how validated evidence moves through remediation workflows.

Explore Workflow Automation 02

Documentation

Review integration planning and operating guidance.

Explore Documentation 03

Trust Centre

Understand scope, access and evidence-handling principles.

Explore Trust Centre
See ThreatCanary in action

Stop counting vulnerabilities. Start proving compromise paths.

Book a technical demo