Prove the operating model
A bounded technical evaluation around one priority attack surface, API portfolio or business question.
- Written success criteria
- Agreed scope and safety boundaries
- Evidence review and expansion decision
ThreatCanary is priced around the environment and validation outcome—not an arbitrary seat count or a misleading one-size-fits-all tier.
These are engagement models, not artificial feature gates. Final pricing reflects the attack surface, APIs, validation depth, frequency, integrations and operating constraints involved.
A bounded technical evaluation around one priority attack surface, API portfolio or business question.
Ongoing discovery, context, validation and remediation workflow for an agreed environment.
Expanded coverage for multiple business units, customer environments or partner-led operations.
Coverage, validation and operating constraints vary materially. ThreatCanary therefore defines the scope, success criteria and evidence requirement before presenting commercial terms.
Direct answers on scope, evidence, safety controls and how ThreatCanary differs from tools you already run.
Pricing is scoped around covered assets, APIs and environments; validation depth and frequency; integrations; reporting; and delivery or approval constraints.
Yes. A bounded technical evaluation can focus on one attack surface, API portfolio or security question with written success criteria and operating limits.
A small API portfolio with narrow validation requirements is materially different from a multi-entity environment with deep integrations and sensitive offensive workflows. A single public price would obscure the actual scope.