SecuritySecurity
ThreatCanary is built around authorised scope, deterministic evidence, auditability, least privilege and safety controls for offensive workflows.
Deterministic evidenceScope-aware executionAdaptive capability
What this covers
Safe offensive validation requires more than AI. It requires control.
Security pages should reassure buyers that ThreatCanary’s powerful capabilities are governed, scoped and auditable.
01Authorised scope
- Scanning and validation are designed to run only against approved assets, APIs and environments.
- Scope definitions, exclusions, rate limits and testing windows help reduce operational risk.
- Sensitive actions can require human approval before execution.
02Evidence and auditability
- Raw outputs, observations, hypotheses, tests, findings and remediation actions remain linked for review.
- Audit logs record important platform activity such as scope changes, credential use, exports and validation workflows.
- Deterministic validation produces reproducible proof rather than relying solely on AI conclusions.
03Data handling
- ThreatCanary supports metadata-first approaches where possible to reduce unnecessary sensitive data movement.
- Evidence can be redacted, scoped and controlled to support privacy and compliance needs.
- Credentials and integration access should use least-privilege configuration and auditable use.
04Operational safety
- Production-safe defaults, intensity controls and approval gates help teams balance depth with risk.
- Generated or adaptive tests should be validated in controlled environments before sensitive use.
- Customers can disable AI-assisted workflows where deterministic-only operation is required.
