Why it matters
- Attackers iterate when the first attempt fails.
- Security testing should adapt to target behaviour while staying safe and authorised.
- Adaptive testing is how ThreatCanary moves beyond static plugin logic.
Adaptive Testing
Adapt test selection and depth when the target requires more than predefined checks.
Evidence traceApproved scopeTarget-aware testing
Capability architecture
Adaptive testing follows the target instead of a static plugin path.
Observed responses, failures and graph context determine the next safe step while approvals constrain sensitive execution.
ThreatCanary approach
- Use validation results, errors, behaviours and graph context to choose next safe steps.
- Escalate to human approval when testing becomes sensitive or uncertain.
- Retain deterministic evidence for each decision and outcome.
What it validates or reveals
- Target-specific weaknesses.
- Paths that static checks would not cover.
- Where additional approval, tooling or research is required.
Evidence produced
- Decision trace showing why each test was selected.
- Executed requests, responses and target-state evidence.
- Coverage comparison showing what changed beyond the predefined path.
Evaluate the capability
Book a product walkthrough