Why it matters
- Attackers combine weak signals into movement paths.
- Teams often see findings without understanding how they connect.
- Attack-path reasoning turns security data into prioritisation logic.
Attack-Path Reasoning
Reason across exposed assets, APIs, identities, vulnerabilities and trust relationships to identify plausible compromise paths.
Deterministic evidenceScope-aware executionAdaptive capability
Capability architecture
Attack-Path Reasoning: context, validation and evidence.
This capability contributes to the same platform outcome: understanding realistic attacker exposure and proving what matters.
ThreatCanary approach
- Traverse the graph to identify paths from exposure to sensitive systems or data.
- Weigh relationships by exploitability, reachability, trust, confidence and impact.
- Use reasoning outputs to guide validation, reporting and remediation priority.
What it validates or reveals
- Likely attacker movement paths.
- Chained weaknesses that matter together.
- Blast radius and remediation chokepoints.
Evidence and outputs
- A clear explanation of the exposure, affected assets and likely attack path.
- Reproducible evidence suitable for analysts, developers and risk owners.
- Prioritisation based on exploitability, business impact, sensitive data and chainability.
- Owner, remediation and workflow context that can move into Jira, Slack, SIEM or reporting.
See ThreatCanary in action
Book a technical demo