Capability architecture
Role-Specific Security Advisors: context, validation and evidence.
This capability contributes to the same platform outcome: understanding realistic attacker exposure and proving what matters.
01Why it matters
- Different stakeholders need different explanations of the same risk.
- Developers need fix guidance; CISOs need impact; GRC needs control mapping; analysts need validation detail.
- Generic chatbots are not enough without grounded context.
02ThreatCanary approach
- Assemble context from findings, assets, APIs, owners, technologies, data tags and related evidence.
- Use persona-specific prompts for developer, security, GRC and CISO views.
- Keep recommendations linked to the evidence trail.
03What it validates or reveals
- Developer remediation guidance.
- Security triage and verification steps.
- Compliance and executive summaries.
04Evidence and outputs
- A clear explanation of the exposure, affected assets and likely attack path.
- Reproducible evidence suitable for analysts, developers and risk owners.
- Prioritisation based on exploitability, business impact, sensitive data and chainability.
- Owner, remediation and workflow context that can move into Jira, Slack, SIEM or reporting.
