SafetySafety Controls
Control automation depth, tool trust, scope, approval and execution limits for offensive workflows.
Deterministic evidenceScope-aware executionAdaptive capability
Capability architecture
Safety Controls: context, validation and evidence.
This capability contributes to the same platform outcome: understanding realistic attacker exposure and proving what matters.
01Why it matters
- Autonomous capability must be safe before it is powerful.
- Production environments require rate limits, exclusions and human approval for sensitive tests.
- Buyers need confidence that the platform cannot drift outside authorised use.
02ThreatCanary approach
- Enforce scope checks, intensity profiles, rate limits, testing windows and exclusion rules.
- Use approval queues for generated tools, risky tests or sensitive actions.
- Track trust levels, AI toggles, credential use and audit logs.
03What it validates or reveals
- Authorised execution.
- Approval requirements.
- Actions, evidence and decisions suitable for audit.
04Evidence and outputs
- A clear explanation of the exposure, affected assets and likely attack path.
- Reproducible evidence suitable for analysts, developers and risk owners.
- Prioritisation based on exploitability, business impact, sensitive data and chainability.
- Owner, remediation and workflow context that can move into Jira, Slack, SIEM or reporting.